Podcast
Root Causes 319: EU Digital Wallets


Hosted by
Tim Callan
Chief Compliance Officer
Jason Soroko
Fellow
Original broadcast date
July 21, 2023
A new agreement mandates that European countries will make digital wallets available to their citizens in 2024. We explain what's coming and some of its implications.
Podcast Transcript
Lightly edited for flow and brevity.
So we in previous podcasts, we talked about EIDAS 2.0 regulation coming into play and that's something we had talked about, which was going to serve as the regulatory framework under which this new identity wallet for Europe would serve. And obviously then, there's a whole lot of work that had been done in there to enable businesses to be able to - - all the different legal constructs that needed to be put in place where there and that's why we're now here. But the reasoning for the timing is that basically by 2024 the edict was every EU member state needs to make a digital identity wallet available to everybody. Within those countries. And so, Tim, what I find interesting is the first thing is as North Americans, we think, well, which company is going to put that out, and what product is this going to be? And really the rule is kind of interesting, saying, look, every country needs to have it. And so I think in some cases, it's going to be, perhaps the country themselves. Perhaps it's going to be a telecom company. Perhaps it'll be a utility. Perhaps it'll be a bank. But at least every country needs to have that in place and make it available for everybody who wants to use it. So the timing is coming. It's going to be next year at some point.
But this new edict dictates that it will be free to the citizens. And what that's going to do is that's going to necessitate a fundamentally different model. You can't just say, well, I'm going to hang up a shingle, and I'm going to follow the rules, and I'm going to charge you - make up your number - 50 euros, 500 euros, whatever it is, and I'm going to give you one of these things. Rather, there's going to have to be some other way for the economics of this entire thing to work.
So maybe lets me list off some of the six main use cases here.
One of them of course is access to government services. And, online citizenship procedures is what they're calling it. So you can imagine what some of those things might be. Perhaps it could even be voting or registering for social assistance or things like that. But some of the other use cases are – and you can imagine these involving private companies opening a bank account and getting a driver's license, which, presumably, again, that's another perhaps e-government service. But then the telecoms want in. SIM card registration. So if you're signing up for cell phone services, you could use this ID. Prescriptions. There's a lot of centralization and government involved in prescriptions in Europe. That's just not the case in North America, but it is over there. And then of course, qualified e-signatures, Tim, which is what we were talking about, which is I want to sign a contract, and I want to sign it with my EU-identity wallet and that will be possible.
So, those are some of the use cases that we're talking about. And that one about driver's license is interesting. I forget which states. I could look at it very quickly, but I do know that at least a few states in the United States have actually signed on with Apple to provide an alternate form of driver's license. You get pulled over by policeman, you can actually show your iPhone and say, hey, here is my driver's license. And those are not just pilots anymore. Those are those are real, usable driver's licenses you can use right now in certain states if you're a citizen of those states.
And I think that the reason I bring that up is because I think, Tim, when you are reading some of this EU-identity wallet literature right now, you’ll hear a lot about EU technology autonomy. And we brought this up before, and I don't think it can be said enough that I think that Europe just did not want to be dominated by the inevitability of big US tech companies who owned the mobile device platforms having and dominating the wallets and what EU citizens are doing with them. So, possibly payments might always be part of that, who knows. European citizens might be using US technology for that but for a lot of these other use cases, Europe just wanted to embrace that and take that completely into themselves and it's become an enormous project for them over there.
And then of course, this also ties into the other thing, which is the spearhead position that the European Union takes on citizens digital privacy. And you can see how this ties into GDPR and EIDAS and all kinds of other things, where they say, look, we want to have this cryptographically, highly secure digital system in place. We're gonna mandate it's available for all the citizens and it's just a very - - it's all part of the same set of trends.
Think of this interesting corridor, Tim. Think of your geography for a moment. Norway, Denmark, Germany - continue south now - Italy, and then off to the left and right, east and west, Latvia and Iceland. So those countries have actually come together, and a number of their financial institutions have actually looked at payment issuance. So in other words, issuing some kind of an identity into the wallet, and then treaties around payment acceptance down to the retail level within those countries. And so, it's basically a consortia of banks in those regions, governments and some other interesting players within that - some of whom I'm familiar with just because of business dealings, and I just wanted to point that out.
I find it interesting that this corridor, cutting right through what is the center of Europe, from north to south, these countries have decided to work together. I just find it interesting. What’s a Norwegian bank doing accepting cross-treaty or consortia agreements that make payment systems similar from Norway to Italy. I just find it interesting that that corridor is one that kind of shaped up even before a lot of this stuff was becoming as mature as it is right now, Tim. But there's a bunch of these if you go and look for it. So there's been a ton of work that's been done and I'm sure a lot of these people are getting quite excited for next year.
In other words, a type of citizen ID. If you're going to have a digital currency within a country and the country is going to mandate it, then obviously, you need some kind of digital ID to float around with it in order to be able to make the transactions, the equivalent of a crypto wallet, but it's actually a digital ID. The scarier parts, though, the scarier parts - and this is why it's probably slower to take in North America, although I really am scared it will come to Canada at some point in the next little while, because the government seems to have this kind of leaning, but I wonder how Europe feels about it as well. As soon as you have this much centralization, there's been all kinds of lip service being paid to hey, you can control certain attributes about yourself that are in your wallet, and you control what is seen and not seen. You can ask for information from private industry to be forgotten about. These are very things that Europe has challenged, and they sound good. The problem is, as soon as you start tying, bank accounts to digital currencies, you start tying it to digital IDs that are like this and then right now, a lot of what's being said is, hey, this is not a complete replacement for your passport, your driver's license, your access to your bank account. It's just to make things more convenient. Hooray. But what happens if the world isn't benevolent. And then all of a sudden, a government wishes to tie this to something like, I don't know, let's say a social credit system, which is where if you don't agree with the government of the day, they can knock a point of social credit off of you and all of a sudden, you no longer have access to your bank account. So these are the kinds of things that I think when we get all excited about digital identities and cryptocurrencies at the federal level, these are the things that go through my mind. And I think we should all be thinking about it because I just don't read enough about it. I don't read enough government assurance that that's not their plan and I find that part of it interesting because it's not just the elephant in the room, that's the herd of elephants in the room that could eventually come and trample all of us.
So all of that stuff is going to come into this too. If we start to say, not only are we going to attach, yoke everything to your digital ID, but we're going to yoke everything to your digital ID on your phone that you own and what if your OS isn't current? And what if your battery doesn't work very well, and it runs out of charge every 30 minutes, and etc., then all of a sudden, that can be problematic, too. So there's a lot of hairy stuff around this that I'm sure is going to work itself out one way or another.

