Podcast
Root Causes 336: Digitally Signing Images on Cameras
Hosted by
Jason Soroko
Fellow
Original broadcast date
October 3, 2023
A recent press release discusses efforts of camera manufacturers and the digital imagery supply chain to create an ecosystem for digitally signed images. We describe what such an ecosystem would do, where it could do in the future, and the advantages and limitations of these schemes.
Podcast transcript
Lightly edited for flow and brevity.
TCTim CallanSo, we’ve talked in the past about deep fakes and how this is presenting a problem for what seemed to be recorded images, whether those might be what look like photographs or videos or audio recordings and so this caught our eye. In this case, I’m referencing Canon Rumors, which is a website that’s focused on the digital photography space and this is actually a press release. I’m seeing it on Canon Rumors but it’s a press release from Thomson Reuters and Canon Europe and Canon, Incorporated dated August 31, 2023. The headline reads, “Canon and Thomson Reuters Team up in Developing Cryptographic Methods to Authenticate Photographs” and this is basically what we talked about right, Jay?
TCTim CallanAnd so, I think how this works is the device itself has functionality built it. Obviously, of course, this is a digital photograph, not a film photograph obviously. That digital image is being signed by the device itself in some way. So when it comes off the device, it is essentially already verifiable that it is unaltered and it’s origin as a photograph that was captured on this particular device is also verifiable.
TCTim CallanOr not signed. We’ve talked about that, too.
TCTim CallanRight. Exactly. We are not solving them, we are creating a situation where you can know that something is not a deep fake and that could be very important. But for the vast majority of the digital content that we are all gonna apprehend in our lives, that particular provenance back to the original capture is just not going to be there. And for the overwhelming majority of the real content that’s really produced, that is not gonna be there. And so, in that sense, it absolutely doesn’t solve that problem, right?
TCTim CallanRight. Now you can imagine it being more powerful once it’s on every Android phone. Right?
TCTim CallanThat at the point just the amount of digital content that could be verified goes way, way up and you can imagine a scenario someday in the future when it’s on everybody’s smartphone and every digital camera that you can buy where something that doesn’t have the signature just kind of gets discounted. It doesn’t mean it isn’t real but it means people won’t give it any weight or credibility. You could see those things coming about but, first of all, not for a long, long time. And even then, like until you have 100% coverage, there’s always the possibility that things were captured that didn’t have this functionality built in.
That’s the world we are living in right now. I don’t think that that’s ever gonna go away. It’s not like all content will be digitally signed because modified images are the reality. In fact, I was trying to think of analogy, Tim, but the fashion model magazines, for example, what image hasn’t been retouched ten ways from Sunday from its origin from the camera.
You can still digitally sign it saying, hey, you know, Studio X has professionally prepared this image for a magazine cover and we’ve signed it and therefore it is a copyrighted piece of material that’s gonna be on the cover of a magazine. That’s terrific. So, that can be signed. But on the other hand, still, the majority of what you are going to be looking at is gonna be unsigned. And not only that, most people consume their imagery in a way where you don’t even have the infrastructure to check the signing mechanism.
TCTim CallanSure. So, again, you could imagine – you could imagine if this was built into all of our computer systems where whether or not this was a signed or unsigned image could actually be scrutinized by my browser for instance and if my browser felt that it was unsigned image, it could pop up a warning. Just like it does now if I go to something it deems to be an unsafe website, right? And it could say, “Warning!, This is unverified content”. Don’t necessarily believe what you see. Like all of these things are doable from a computer programming perspective but we are imagining putting a vast ecosystem in place before such a thing occurs.
Now maybe that starts with a high-end SLR from Canon. Maybe that’s where it begins. And a deal with Thomson Reuters and maybe that’s how you get a footprint and you start expanding. There’s just a lot of distance between this particular solution set and something that helps you and me know that a picture we see of someone famous is real. Right?
Now maybe that starts with a high-end SLR from Canon. Maybe that’s where it begins. And a deal with Thomson Reuters and maybe that’s how you get a footprint and you start expanding. There’s just a lot of distance between this particular solution set and something that helps you and me know that a picture we see of someone famous is real. Right?
And so, you just mentioned an image and a browser. There might be an ecosystem there for verifying signatures. Ok. Great. I seriously doubt you are gonna have that with audio.
TCTim CallanSure. Well, and audio and video. Like video is even worse. If I’m a YouTuber, then even if my camera is digitally signing the raw video clips that I’m recording, I’m editing that. Once I edit that, I don’t have the original stuff.
TCTim CallanSo, even if I can sign that someday in the future and say I’m signing my edited video. This really came from me, the real YouTuber, that still doesn’t trace back to the origin of the raw video.
So, the point here we are trying to say is that hooray, PKI becomes even more ubiquitous and it has an absolutely valuable purpose but don’t read these articles as deep fakes will be solved anytime soon – first of all – or even at any point in the deeper future. I think it’s here to stay and all the warnings Tim and I have given you, keep it in mind.
TCTim CallanAnd we could imagine a world where there is a set of content that I am able to trust as verified and then there is a set of content that’s just in the DMC and you don’t know what it is. Right? I could imagine that coming about and being something sometime in the future where I as a user can say, ah-ha, this is an official photograph from whoever – the White House. Right?
TCTim CallanI mean, that’s a legitimate point and we just talked about this in our Episode 334 when we were talking about sort of institutionalized, systematized functionality that sort of hurts small players. That was a different space. We were talking about browsers but I think that same argument could apply here. Right? To say you don’t want to create a system whereby fair use content gets penalized. Or research gets penalized. Or criticism gets penalized. Where I can’t go online and have an opposing viewpoint to the people with the large bull horn because some signing system is gonna prevent my content from being seen. So, those are concerns, too.
TCTim CallanAnd they are rock solid and they are reliable and they are undefeated and there is no reason to believe they will be defeated. So, very important building blocks. So, go on, Jay.
TCTim CallanI think that’s fair. And by the way, everything we said about deep fakes applies equally well to altered images. Before this wave of interest in deep fakes, if you just go back in time to like the 2020 election, there were a bunch of altered images circulated of major political candidates. We talked about the Biden video a lot. There was some things about Trump that just weren’t right. Right? They weren’t real. And that was pre-deep fake. Just a good old-fashioned photoshopping, rotoscoping, kind of counterfeiting of an image that went on. That also is a trust problem. As the tools get stronger and better and easier, they don’t even have to be deep fake, especially if it’s AI-assisted alteration, getting better and better. And that isn’t going to go away under these circumstances. Although, again, there may be specific chains of custody, if you will, where we are able to prove the authenticity of a digital recording of some form and there could be circumstances where those chains of custody really matter.
TCTim CallanSo, here we are. So, this is an interesting development and probably more will happen with this. I think we will return to this topic but that’s where we are today.